A recent investigation by consumer advice group Which? has uncovered concerning privacy practices involving smart air fryers, revealing potential data collection risks that go far beyond simple cooking functions.
The study examined three air fryer models from Chinese manufacturers Xiaomi, Tencent, and Aigostar, and discovered something surprising: these kitchen devices were attempting to request audio recording permissions through their associated smartphone apps.
What makes this revelation particularly troubling is that users were not provided clear explanations about why these cooking appliances would need to record audio conversations. Even more alarming, the research found that both Aigostar and Xiaomi fryers explicitly stated in their privacy notices that personal user data could be sent to servers located in China.
The investigation further exposed additional data tracking mechanisms. The Xiaomi air fryer’s app was linked to trackers from major platforms like Facebook and Pangle, an advertising network associated with TikTok for Business. Depending on the user’s location, the device could also potentially connect with Tencent, a prominent Chinese technology company.
Beyond audio recording, these smart air fryers seemed eager to collect extensive personal information. Some models requested optional details such as the user’s gender and date of birth, while all three devices sought precise location data from customers.
When approached for comment, Aigostar denied having any audio recording capabilities. The company emphasized that location permissions are strictly used for Wi-Fi setup and device connectivity, and users maintain complete control over granting such access.
Harry Rose, editor of Which? magazine, expressed significant concern about these findings. “Our research demonstrates how smart technology manufacturers are currently collecting consumer data seemingly without restraint and with minimal transparency,” he stated.
The growing trend of data collection through everyday devices has caught the attention of regulatory bodies. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has committed to issuing new guidance in spring 2025 to establish clearer data protection standards for smart product manufacturers.
Stephen Almond from the ICO offered a stark warning about the hidden costs of these convenient technologies. “Consumers are essentially paying twice,” he explained. “First with money for the product, and then with their personal data, which can be used for targeted advertising and market research.”
This investigation highlights a broader issue in the era of smart technology: the growing tension between convenience and privacy. As kitchen appliances and household devices become increasingly connected, consumers must remain vigilant about the data they unknowingly share.
The revelations serve as a critical reminder to carefully review privacy policies, understand app permissions, and make informed decisions about the smart devices we invite into our homes. While technology continues to evolve, protecting personal information should always remain a top priority.
As the tech industry continues to push boundaries, regulatory bodies and consumer protection groups like Which? play a crucial role in holding manufacturers accountable and ensuring transparency in data collection practices.